![ark encounter artistic licences ark encounter artistic licences](https://d2fxn1d7fsdeeo.cloudfront.net/kentuckyliving.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/07010629/ark.jpg)
And of course, we believe each one is accurate. The point here is not whether the Bible passage being cited is scientifically accurate but whether we have accurately quoted what it states. Some signs in the Ark simply explain what the Bible states about a given topic. Some signs are simply illustrations of animals that are accurately painted and contain no words. Third, Rosenau’s article shows that he is unaware of the signage at the Ark since there are other signs, besides the wayfinding signs, that have little to do with science. That is, the exit signs identify the exits and the restroom signs direct people to the restrooms. Rosenau implied that every sign at the Ark contains scientific errors, but there are plenty of wayfinding signs that are scientifically accurate. Second, if a person does not really know the subject he is talking about, he needs to exercise caution instead of making bombastic claims like this. There is one sign in the Ancient Man exhibit that discusses the historical fact that people in ancient times used the stars for navigation and time-keeping purposes. First, there is no signage about astrophysics on the Ark. There are multiple problems with these statements. It may be impossible to find a single sign in the park that is free of scientific errors.” His most embarrassing gaffe came when he stated, “From astrophysics to zookeeping, the visitor is deluged with misinformation. Those who have visited the Ark Encounter will quickly realize that Rosenau either has not been to the Ark, or that he did visit but didn’t pay attention to the signs, or that he is simply lying to readers about what is in the Ark.
![ark encounter artistic licences ark encounter artistic licences](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nJhj9AzhtLo/maxresdefault.jpg)
Noah’s Ark needed to float for a maximum of five months before landing on the mountains of Ararat. Yet the Wyoming, the boat often cited by skeptics because it was the largest wooden ship in the past century, was in service for over 14 years before it sank.
![ark encounter artistic licences ark encounter artistic licences](https://assets.arkencounter.com/img/blog/2019/01/ark-encounter-jan2019.jpg)
Like other skeptics, he has based this claim on the mistaken notion that wooden ships the size of the Ark cannot remain afloat. Without detailed designs of Noah’s Ark, Rosenau could not know that it would be destroyed in the Flood. There is no way for Rosenau to know that the Ark would have twisted apart in the Flood. Rosenau also stated, “Ark Encounter is founded on the notion that all the walking and flying animals alive today descend from specimens caged aboard a boat so unwieldy that it surely would have twisted apart in the roiling waters of a biblical flood.” We have repeatedly addressed the seakeeping of Noah’s Ark, so there is no need to rehash it here. “Stuffed animal” or world-class sculpture of a Placerias? Many of our staunchest opponents are willing to acknowledge the exceedingly high quality of the sculptures, so to call these magnificent works of art “stuffed creatures” is simply an attempt to ridicule the Ark Encounter. These amazing, realistic-looking figures were meticulously designed and built by our talented artisans. 1 Instead, Rosenau sought to belittle the remarkable craftsmanship displayed in the scores of animal sculptures found throughout the Ark. This line likely came from a hit piece published by the New York Times that severely distorted what their reporter was shown and told when she toured the Ark’s design studio. But sadly, as is so often the case, his antagonism toward the biblical account of creation recorded in Genesis has caused him to make some rather embarrassing blunders.įor example, he claimed that the Ark Encounter “features stuffed creatures.” No, he was not referencing the plush toys sold in the Ark’s wonderful gift shop. We would think that Rosenau would be interested in presenting facts in a neutral manner since he is presumably dedicated to science education. As explained in our article “ Public Schools Invited to Tour the Ark,” there is nothing unconstitutional about public schools taking students to the Ark as long as it is done for educational purposes. The $1 tickets were offered in response to the misinformation promoted by another secular group, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, that claimed to have sent a warning to every school district in Kentucky, Tennessee, Indiana, West Virginia, and Ohio about the alleged unconstitutionality of visiting the Ark. He claimed that the reason the Ark Encounter offers tickets for $1 per student and free for accompanying teachers is perhaps due to “disappointing visitor numbers so far.” In reality, we are quite pleased with the hundreds of thousands of visitors who have already toured the Ark. In the writer’s zeal to disparage the Ark Encounter, Josh Rosenau, programs and policy director of the US National Center for Science Education, made numerous blatant errors that reveal his extreme bias.
![ark encounter artistic licences ark encounter artistic licences](https://tikvah.life/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ark-sky-march17.jpg)
Recently, the New Scientist magazine published an article discouraging public school teachers from taking their students on field trips to the Ark Encounter.